Skip to main content

Flush with inequality

I am aware that previously in my blog, I have focused on the experience of cisgender women when examining gender in relation to water and development in Africa. Therefore, for my final blog post, I would like to look at the experience of those within the LGBTQ community, focusing specifically on transgender individuals.

In an article written by Keuroghlian et al. it is stated that 'sexual and gender minority (SGM) people are often stigmatised and mistreated based on their sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression' (2021). SGM individuals experience 'chronic discrimination, victimisation and violence' (ibid). It is for these reasons that it is crucial to spotlight the experience of SGM people when looking at the wider topic of water and development in Africa, because at the moment the hardships faced by these groups are not being heard in discussions of international development. 

One area where the difference of experience is particularly apparent, is the area of sanitation. As stated by Nigel Patel, 'throughout history, toilet spaces have both reflected and enforced societal assumptions about gender and served as important sites for societal change' (2017). The toilet therefore has the potential to act as an important catalyst for the inclusion of SGM individuals in African societies. Patel focuses on the case study of South Africa, where he argues that the sanitation practices of sex-segregated bathrooms and the Western toilet cistern were 'imposed on indigenous communities through colonisation and apartheid' (ibid). In this way, Patel argues that the sex-segregation of sanitation spaces 'was central to the logic of complete separation of races in all aspects of public and private life' under apartheid (ibid). Considering these connotations, it is no surprise that the implementation and use of these sex-segregated spaces continue to have hugely negative implications for those of the SGM community, and the LGBTQ community more widely. 

Many of the toilet blocks that have been installed in South African townships do not take into account the needs of the individuals that use them. There have been instances of attacks on women who have had to walk long distances to the toilets from their homes, and the spaces rarely cater to those with disabilities, specifically those who use a wheelchair (ibid). At the moment, protests surrounding the low standards of these facilities are largely based around the want to provide safe and accessible sanitation spaces. However, attention needs to be paid specifically to the experience of transgender individuals in order to fully disrupt the colonial system of 'racial and gendered urban planning' that have played a part in South Africa's current sanitation system (ibid). 

The toilets can be gender neutral but beyond that you need to create an inclusive space. It is not enough to just say or label your bathroom as gender neutral (Patel, 2017)

It is imperative that 'for transgender users, public toilets should be places without hostility and risk of violence' (Moreira et al., 2021). Making existing public toilets gender neutral does not tackle the fears of safety and dignity raised by many currently using these facilities, especially due to the existence of gender-specific features such as urinals. Instead, Moreira et al. suggest that the best design would consist of individual cubicles containing a toilet and washbasin (toilet here being used not only to refer to the Western idea of what a toilet should look like) (ibid). This would constitute a small step in combatting the discrimination of transgender individuals, and would create inclusive spaces where everyone, regardless of gender, could feel safe. 

I acknowledge that this is only a very small amendment and that there are plenty more steps to creating societies that are completely inclusive of those within the LGBTQ community. There could be an entire blog series focussed on just this topic, and with everything I have written about throughout this blog series, it is impossible to reach anything below surface level in such a short post and of course it is not only the area of sanitation where the experiences of members of the LGBTQ community are underrepresented in development. It is crucial that all development goals are made wholly inclusive in order to be most effective. This doesn't only happen through top-down policy, but needs to be implemented on a local scale too, most effectively within the classroom through education. There is an urgent call to dismantle the taboo of difference and to create a global culture of acceptance and inclusivity, which begins through objects as unremarkable as the toilet. 

Comments

  1. I really enjoyed reading this post! I loved that you've included the LGBT community in your sanitation posts as you are definitely right about the lack of representation in institutional development discussions, which consequently results in their needs not being heard or met. I strongly agree with the distinction you make between merely labelling a sanitation facility as "gender neutral", and actually curating this space in practice. While these might be 'small steps', I believe they are important steps nonetheless.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your comment! It is a complex issue of how to curate genuinely gender neutral spaces but I agree these are important steps in the right direction.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Access to clean water is an issue of gender inequality, period.

This week, the lecture focus was sanitation. As a result, I wanted to look into the term "period poverty". I have heard this term countless times and yet I have never looked into how this issue plays out in real time.  One of the definitions for 'period poverty' or menstrual health management (MHM) was not having access to soap and water to be able to wash during menstruation, as well as not having access to facilities where menstrual products can be disposed of correctly ( Tull, 2019 ). Period poverty is therefore clearly related to the problem of access to clean water.  Research by UNICEF has highlighted a shocking statistic that '65% of females in Kibera... had traded sex for sanitary pads due to the prevalence of period poverty and the shame, stigma and public health misinformation which surrounds menstruation' ( ibid ). Though it is important to acknowledge that this statistic is only indicative of the wider issue (and UNICEF Kenya stated that this inform...

Don't COP out of tackling gender inequality

COP26 , the upcoming climate conference being held in Glasgow between 31st October and 12th November, provides an interesting opportunity to examine the role that women are playing in Africa's current fight on climate change.  In my previous blog post, I looked at Oladosu Adenike's Guardian  article entitled " It makes economic sense for women to lead the fight against the climate crisis ", in which she stated that women in sub-Saharan Africa specifically are 'bearing the brunt of a crisis they did nothing to cause' which is the quote I would like to open this second blog post with (2021).  Urmilla Bob and Agnes Babugura, both South African academics, wrote an interesting overview of the relationship between gender and climate change in Africa in their paper entitled " Contextualising and conceptualising gender and climate change in Africa " (2014). They highlight the fact that it was at COP13 in Bali, 2007, where the Global Gender and Climate Allia...

Mind the Gender Pay Gap

As has been highlighted in the comments of several of my previous blog posts, one of the biggest barriers to gender equality is financial inequality.  As was stated by Asongu et al. in their paper " Inequality and gender economic inclusion: The moderating role of financial access in Sub-Saharan Africa ", 'women in the sub-[Saharan] region are the poorest and least included in the formal economy in the world and the exclusion of women represents a significant waste of development resources. No society can sustainably develop (politically, economically and socially) if the majority of its population is excluded from contributing to economic development ' (2020).  In fact, 'the cost of gender exclusion in the sub-region is estimated at about 2.5 trillion USD' ( ibid ). This amount of money would make a huge difference to achieving targets 6.1 and 6.2 of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), referring to access to drinking water and sanitation. In fact, a Unice...